Understanding the Drivers of Green Building Certification in the United States
A Longitudinal Analysis of Incentives, Demographics, and Political Context (2000–2024)
By Nico Taber, Nicholas Chrapliwy, William J. Barber III
By Nico Taber, Nicholas Chrapliwy, William J. Barber III
In the face of escalating climate challenges, energy consumption in the built environment has emerged as a critical point of intervention. Buildings account for nearly 40% of total energy use and over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, making them a key target for decarbonization strategies. In response, federal and state governments have invested heavily in programs designed to reduce building energy use, promote energy efficiency, and shift toward more sustainable infrastructure. Among the most visible and accessible indicators of these efforts are green building certifications such as ENERGY STAR and LEED.
Despite the availability of certification pathways, adoption of green building standards remains uneven across geography and time. Some states consistently certify large numbers of buildings, while others lag behind. Understanding what drives this variation is central to evaluating the effectiveness of current policy tools and identifying opportunities for more equitable and efficient deployment of sustainability programs.
One of the primary levers for encouraging green construction and retrofitting is the use of financial incentives. These incentives, including rebates, tax credits, loans, and grants, are designed to lower the cost barrier to energy-efficient upgrades. The Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE) catalogues such programs across all 50 states, offering a comprehensive view of the policy landscape. While many studies have examined the technical or economic impact of individual incentive programs, fewer have assessed their cumulative, long-term influence on state-level certification outcomes.
Even fewer have considered how non-policy variables, such as demographic structure or partisan control of government, influence energy-related decision-making at scale. Political alignment may affect not only whether programs are enacted, but also how well they are implemented and received. Demographic factors may influence demand for certification differently across population segments, raising questions about equity in the distribution of green building benefits.
This study addresses these gaps by combining more than two decades of data on ENERGY STAR building certifications, state-level clean energy incentive programs, U.S. Census demographics, and political control of state governments. By constructing a harmonized state-year dataset and applying a range of statistical and machine learning techniques, we explore:
We integrate multiple data sources, including the DSIRE API, ENERGY STAR building registry, state partisanship records, and harmonized census estimates from 2000 to 2024. Our analysis includes exploratory data visualization, ridge regression, principal component analysis (PCA), random forest classification, and geospatial mapping. Through this approach, we aim to uncover not only statistical patterns, but also the structural context that shapes how and where green building adoption occurs across the United States.
Sustainability Data Science Intern
Nico Taber is an undergraduate biomedical engineering and chemistry student interested in applying analytical and computational methods behind traditional biomedical contexts. His research focuses on using data-driven approaches yo understand how policy, financial incentives, and structural factors influence sustainability outcomes, such as green building adoption. Nico is particularly interested in bridging engineering intuition with large-scale data analysis to inform the design of more effective and scalable sustainability-focused technologies and programs.
Executive Director, The Rhizome Institute
Board Member, The Rhizome Institute